Warning: Duplicate entry '652774' for key 1 query: INSERT INTO watchdog (uid, type, message, severity, link, location, referer, hostname, timestamp) VALUES (0, 'php', '<em>Table &amp;#039;c&amp;#039; is marked as crashed and should be repaired\nquery: SELECT c.nid, c.subject, c.cid, c.timestamp FROM comments c INNER JOIN node n ON n.nid = c.nid WHERE c.nid IN (168,295,293,294,280,281,276,274,270,277) AND n.status = 1 AND c.status = 0 ORDER BY c.cid DESC LIMIT 0, 10</em> in <em>/home/inn0v4t3/public_html/includes/database.mysql.inc</em> on line <em>172</em>.', 2, '', 'http://www.innovationexchange.net/tags/evaluation', '', '3.94.196.192', 1560656421) in /home/inn0v4t3/public_html/includes/database.mysql.inc on line 172
evaluation | Open Innovation Exchange
Home

evaluation

Diffusion of Innovations and Open Learning Systems

Thu, 26/04/2007 - 10:43 — AndyDearden

OK - model version 1 looks good - but be careful - availability bias means that it is very easy to believe that the model you have is complete when that may not be the case.

 

A few points:

Firstly, can I just mention that I'm not very keen on the idea of
labelling things with roles 'innovator',
'replicator', 'mentor'. Although you make clear people might perform
multiple roles, most people most of the time sit in one role. I would
prefer abstract verbs - innovate, replicate, mentor. I'm not going to
get upset if we don't do this in the bid, but it does colour what I say
below.  read more »

Syndicate content